Debate between Danielle Smith and Rachel Notley centers on their past records
The debate between Danielle Smith, former leader of the Wildrose Party, and Rachel Notley, current leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP), recently turned into a heated exchange between the two candidates over their respective past records. The two women went head-to-head in a debate that focused on issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, but it was their records that seemed to get the most attention.
Danielle Smith’s Record
Danielle Smith’s record came under heavy scrutiny during the debate, with Rachel Notley pointing out some of the more controversial policies that the Wildrose party had championed during its time in office. Smith was the leader of that party from 2009 to 2014, and during that time, they had advocated for the privatization of healthcare and the elimination of the minimum wage, among other things.
Notley took Smith to task on these issues, arguing that they showed a lack of concern for the most vulnerable members of society. “When we talk about healthcare, we need to make sure that everyone has access to it,” Notley said. “Privatization is not the answer.” She also criticized Smith for her stance on the minimum wage, saying that it was “shameful” to suggest that workers shouldn’t be paid enough to provide for themselves and their families.
Rachel Notley’s Record
Rachel Notley’s record also came under scrutiny during the debate, with Smith highlighting some of the NDP’s more controversial policies. Notley has been the leader of the NDP since 2014, and during that time, they have implemented policies such as a carbon tax and a minimum wage increase.
Smith argued that these policies have had a negative impact on the economy, pointing to job losses and higher energy costs. “It’s all well and good to talk about protecting the environment,” Smith said, “but we can’t do that at the expense of our economy.” She also criticized Notley for not doing enough to boost the oil and gas industry.
At the end of the debate, it was clear that both candidates had their strengths and weaknesses. Smith came across as a strong and confident speaker, but her past record may be a liability for her campaign. Notley, on the other hand, seemed more empathetic and focused on issues that matter to ordinary Albertans, but her policies may be perceived as too left-wing for some voters.
Ultimately, the debate between Danielle Smith and Rachel Notley highlights the importance of a candidate’s past record when it comes to elections. Voters want to know where their candidates stand on the issues and what they have done in the past to support those positions. It’s up to each candidate to make their case to the voters and convince them that they are the best person for the job.
#elections #debate #pastrecords #DanielleSmith #RachelNotley #WildroseParty #NDP #healthcare #education #infrastructure #privatization #minimumwage #carbon tax #oilandgas #Albertans
Summary: Danielle Smith and Rachel Notley recently debated on issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, but the focus was on their respective past records. Smith was criticized for controversial policies such as healthcare privatization and minimum wage elimination, while Notley faced scrutiny for policies such as a carbon tax and minimum wage increase. The debate highlights the importance of a candidate’s past record in elections. #NEWS